Kusum W/o Tulsiram Mule,Age 55 yrs,Occ Household vs Abhijit S/o Hemant Dharmadhikari,Age 46 yrs,Occ Business — 832/2023
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 166. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAKB210003252023
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
745/2023
Filing Date
01-06-2023
Registration No
832/2023
Registration Date
05-07-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kusum W/o Tulsiram Mule,Age 55 yrs,Occ Household
Adv. Sri.Nagesh Reddy Adv.
Venkat S/o Prakash Mule Age 32 yrs,Occ Hair Cutting Saloon
Respondent(s)
Abhijit S/o Hemant Dharmadhikari,Age 46 yrs,Occ Business
United India Insurance Co.,Ltd., Kubera Chambers,
Hearing History
Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
EVIDENCE.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 30-01-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE. |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE. |
Interim Orders
Summary Case No.: MVC 832/2023 | Hearing Date: 17.01.2026 The court examined witness PW1 in this motor vehicle accident compensation case involving a fatal accident dated 24.01.2023 on the Solapur-Pune highway. The witness's testimony was found to contain significant inconsistencies and false statements regarding family relationships, the deceased's income (Rs. 30,000/month claimed without documentary proof), and injury circumstances. The court noted the witness admitted to filing false claims and providing misleading evidence about dependency and treatment expenses (Rs. 20,000 claimed). Order: No further cross-examination is required; the case proceeds with the witness examination concluded on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Case No.: MVC 832/2023 | Hearing Date: 17.01.2026 The court examined witness PW1 in this motor vehicle accident compensation case involving a fatal accident dated 24.01.2023 on the Solapur-Pune highway. The witness's testimony was found to contain significant inconsistencies and false statements regarding family relationships, the deceased's income (Rs. 30,000/month claimed without documentary proof), and injury circumstances. The court noted the witness admitted to filing false claims and providing misleading evidence about dependency and treatment expenses (Rs. 20,000 claimed). Order: No further cross-examination is required; the case proceeds with the witness examination concluded on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts