Sushilabai W/o Late Ramrao Kulkarni, Age.75yrs, Occ.Household, R/o.Aland, Dist.Kalaburagi. vs Govind S/o Ramrao Kulkarni, Age.42yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Hiroli, Tq.Aland, Dist.Kalaburagi. — 19/2017
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 391. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAKB210002962017
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
21/2017
Filing Date
07-12-2017
Registration No
19/2017
Registration Date
07-12-2017
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sushilabai W/o Late Ramrao Kulkarni, Age.75yrs, Occ.Household, R/o.Aland, Dist.Kalaburagi.
Adv. B A DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Govind S/o Ramrao Kulkarni, Age.42yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Hiroli, Tq.Aland, Dist.Kalaburagi.
Jayashri W/o Ramrao Kulkarni, Age.70yrs, Occ.Householdwork, R/o.Hiroli, Tq.Aland, Dist.Kalaburagi
Hearing History
Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. | |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. | |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. | |
| 10-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. | |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
Interim Orders
Petition Dismissed In Civil Misc. Case No. 19/2017 (dated 18.02.2025), the court dismissed the petitioner's application after finding that she failed to establish any rights or possession over the disputed properties (NIR-1 to NIR-3). The court rejected her claims, noting insufficient evidence of legal interest and finding that she had presented false affidavits and false testimony to gain unjustified legal advantage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Petition Dismissed In Civil Misc. Case No. 19/2017 (dated 18.02.2025), the court dismissed the petitioner's application after finding that she failed to establish any rights or possession over the disputed properties (NIR-1 to NIR-3). The court rejected her claims, noting insufficient evidence of legal interest and finding that she had presented false affidavits and false testimony to gain unjustified legal advantage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts