Mansing S/o Sitaram Rathod, Age 68 Yrs, Occ. Agri, R/o Teerth Tanda, Tq. Aland Dist. Kalaburagi. vs Sonabai W/o Laxman Age. 55 Yrs, Occ. Age. R/o Teerth Tanda, Tq. Aland Dist. Kalaburagi. — 49/2019

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 7rule1and2. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB210002072019

ARGUMENTS.

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

50/2019

Filing Date

17-07-2019

Registration No

49/2019

Registration Date

17-07-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

Acts & Sections

Sec151 Cpc Section 7rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Mansing S/o Sitaram Rathod, Age 68 Yrs, Occ. Agri, R/o Teerth Tanda, Tq. Aland Dist. Kalaburagi.

Adv. B A DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

Sonabai W/o Laxman Age. 55 Yrs, Occ. Age. R/o Teerth Tanda, Tq. Aland Dist. Kalaburagi.

Hearing History

Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

13-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

28-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

31-01-2026

ARGUMENTS.

Interim Orders

19-07-2019
Orders
12-03-2020
Deposition
17-03-2020
Judgment
29-09-2022
Deposition
25-05-2023
Deposition
27-07-2023
Deposition
27-09-2023
Deposition
02-11-2023
Deposition
19-01-2024
Deposition
30-01-2024
Deposition
01-06-2024
Orders
28-11-2025
Deposition
19-12-2025
Deposition

Summary In O.S. No. 49/2019, the court proceeded with examination of witnesses on 19.12.2025, with the plaintiff's counsel (L.K.M.) and defendant's counsel (Sri.) presenting arguments regarding a property sale dispute allegedly made for marriage purposes. The court found the defendant's testimony regarding agreement to sell the property for marriage to be false and rejected it. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In O.S. No. 49/2019, the court proceeded with examination of witnesses on 19.12.2025, with the plaintiff's counsel (L.K.M.) and defendant's counsel (Sri.) presenting arguments regarding a property sale dispute allegedly made for marriage purposes. The court found the defendant's testimony regarding agreement to sell the property for marriage to be false and rejected it. The case is adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case