Nagaraj S/o Shivasharanappa Sanamukh Age 35 Years Occ Agriculture And Private Service vs Vijayalaxmi W/o Shivasharanappa Sanmukh Age 62 Years Occ Agriculture And Household — 6/2024

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th April 2026.

Case disposed

FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr

CNR: KAKB210001622024

e-Filing Number

24-04-2024

Filing Number

6/2024

Filing Date

04-Jun-2024

Registration No

6/2024

Registration Date

07-Jun-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

Decision Date

25-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Sec151 Cpc Section 54

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nagaraj S/o Shivasharanappa Sanamukh Age 35 Years Occ Agriculture And Private Service

    Adv. B A DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vijayalaxmi W/o Shivasharanappa Sanmukh Age 62 Years Occ Agriculture And Household

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: FDP No. 6/2024 The court granted Nagaraj's petition to convert a preliminary partition decree into a final decree. Nagaraj had won a 1/5th share of jointly-held properties in OS No. 113/2022 (decided March 2, 2024), but respondents failed to allot his share. The court appointed a commissioner who divided the properties into five equal blocks. Since respondents filed no objections, the court allotted Block I to Nagaraj, Block II to respondent Rajashri, Block III to respondent Vijayalaxmi, Block IV to respondent Hanumesh, and Block V to respondent Preeti, with each receiving approximately equal land parcels. Costs were borne by the parties themselves. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  8. 05-Feb-2026

    First Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  9. 06-Jan-2026

    First Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  10. 27-Nov-2025

    First Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  12. 11-Sep-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  13. 25-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  14. 16-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  15. 28-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  16. 18-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  17. 11-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  18. 03-Mar-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  19. 29-Jan-2025

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  20. 13-Dec-2024

    Notice

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  21. 03-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  22. 30-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  23. 01-Oct-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  24. 02-Sep-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  25. 01-Aug-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  26. 08-Jul-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge,aland

  27. 07-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 04-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FDP No. 6/2024 The court granted Nagaraj's petition to convert a preliminary partition decree into a final decree. Nagaraj had won a 1/5th share of jointly-held properties in OS No. 113/2022 (decided March 2, 2024), but respondents failed to allot his share. The court appointed a commissioner who divided the properties into five equal blocks. Since respondents filed no objections, the court allotted Block I to Nagaraj, Block II to respondent Rajashri, Block III to respondent Vijayalaxmi, Block IV to respondent Hanumesh, and Block V to respondent Preeti, with each receiving approximately equal land parcels. Costs were borne by the parties themselves. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case