Nagaraj S/o Shivasharanappa Sanamukh Age 35 Years Occ Agriculture And Private Service vs Vijayalaxmi W/o Shivasharanappa Sanmukh Age 62 Years Occ Agriculture And Household — 6/2024
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 54. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th April 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAKB210001622024
e-Filing Number
24-04-2024
Filing Number
6/2024
Filing Date
04-06-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
07-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Decision Date
25th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nagaraj S/o Shivasharanappa Sanamukh Age 35 Years Occ Agriculture And Private Service
Adv. B A DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Vijayalaxmi W/o Shivasharanappa Sanmukh Age 62 Years Occ Agriculture And Household
Hearing History
Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Disposed
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
FIRST HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 04-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 02-03-2026 | FIRST HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: FDP No. 6/2024 The court granted Nagaraj's petition to convert a preliminary partition decree into a final decree. Nagaraj had won a 1/5th share of jointly-held properties in OS No. 113/2022 (decided March 2, 2024), but respondents failed to allot his share. The court appointed a commissioner who divided the properties into five equal blocks. Since respondents filed no objections, the court allotted Block I to Nagaraj, Block II to respondent Rajashri, Block III to respondent Vijayalaxmi, Block IV to respondent Hanumesh, and Block V to respondent Preeti, with each receiving approximately equal land parcels. Costs were borne by the parties themselves. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FDP No. 6/2024 The court granted Nagaraj's petition to convert a preliminary partition decree into a final decree. Nagaraj had won a 1/5th share of jointly-held properties in OS No. 113/2022 (decided March 2, 2024), but respondents failed to allot his share. The court appointed a commissioner who divided the properties into five equal blocks. Since respondents filed no objections, the court allotted Block I to Nagaraj, Block II to respondent Rajashri, Block III to respondent Vijayalaxmi, Block IV to respondent Hanumesh, and Block V to respondent Preeti, with each receiving approximately equal land parcels. Costs were borne by the parties themselves. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts