Maheboob Sab S/o Abdul Ali @ Bashasab Ambalagi Age. 65 Yrs, Occ. Agri, R/o Aland Tq.Aland vs Doulatbee W/o Lal Ahamad Mullanwale Age. 60 Yrs, Occ. Agri, R/o Nellur Tq. Aland Dist. Kalaburagi — 19/2019

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/oVIIrule1. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB210001132019

ARGUMENTS.

Next Hearing

28th March 2026

Filing Number

19/2019

Filing Date

13-03-2019

Registration No

19/2019

Registration Date

13-03-2019

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

Acts & Sections

Sec151 Cpc Section U/oVIIrule1

Petitioner(s)

Maheboob Sab S/o Abdul Ali @ Bashasab Ambalagi Age. 65 Yrs, Occ. Agri, R/o Aland Tq.Aland

Adv. PRADEED N SHAH

Respondent(s)

Doulatbee W/o Lal Ahamad Mullanwale Age. 60 Yrs, Occ. Agri, R/o Nellur Tq. Aland Dist. Kalaburagi

Hearing History

Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

28-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

13-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

05-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

Interim Orders

18-06-2019
Issue
12-07-2019
Issue
13-07-2022
Deposition
11-10-2022
Deposition
15-11-2022
Deposition
25-11-2022
Deposition
25-11-2022
Deposition
08-12-2022
Deposition
20-07-2023
Deposition
03-08-2023
Deposition
04-10-2023
Deposition
09-11-2023
Deposition
04-01-2024
Deposition
22-04-2025
Orders

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's Interim Application No. 13 seeking appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed land (4 acres 18 guntas) in a title and injunction suit. The judge held that since both parties claim possession of the property, the question of possession must be decided by the court based on documentary and oral evidence—not delegated to a commissioner. The application was dismissed as unmaintainable and ill-timed, filed at the final arguments stage without sufficient justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's Interim Application No. 13 seeking appointment of a court commissioner to survey disputed land (4 acres 18 guntas) in a title and injunction suit. The judge held that since both parties claim possession of the property, the question of possession must be decided by the court based on documentary and oral evidence—not delegated to a commissioner. The application was dismissed as unmaintainable and ill-timed, filed at the final arguments stage without sufficient justification. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case