Sharanbasappa so Ambaraya Karahari age 26 yrs vs Sayabanna so Chanmalappa Karahari age 68 yrs — 33/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAKB210000962014

ARGUMENTS.

Next Hearing

11th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

34/2014

Filing Date

29-03-2014

Registration No

33/2014

Registration Date

29-03-2014

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O7,

Petitioner(s)

Sharanbasappa so Ambaraya Karahari age 26 yrs

Adv. P N Shah

Vilmalabai wo Ambaraya Karahari age 39 yrs

Respondent(s)

Sayabanna so Chanmalappa Karahari age 68 yrs

Rachamma wo Sayabanna Karahari age 60 yrs

Ambaraya so Sayabanna Karahari age 45 yrs

Shivanand so Sayabanna Karahari age 42 yrs

Bandamma @ Shivaleela wo Rajshekhar sajji age 35 yrs

Shankreppa so Basawaraj Mangani age 34 yrs

Hearing History

Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS.

28-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

07-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

Interim Orders

20-08-2016
Issue
01-07-2019
Orders
16-07-2019
Deposition
23-01-2023
Deposition
02-02-2023
Deposition
23-03-2023
Deposition
30-06-2023
Deposition
02-08-2023
Deposition
13-09-2023
Deposition
12-12-2023
Deposition
22-02-2024
Deposition
12-03-2024
Deposition
27-03-2024
Deposition
19-04-2024
Deposition
09-07-2024
Deposition
01-08-2024
Deposition
19-09-2024
Deposition
21-11-2024
Deposition

Summary In OS No. 33/2014 (dated 21.11.2024), the court ordered the distribution of Rs. 80,000/- among the parties, with Rs. 40,000/- each allocated to the 4th and 3rd defendants respectively. The court rejected claims of false statements and improper documentation, finding no grounds for further inquiry and dismissing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS No. 33/2014 (dated 21.11.2024), the court ordered the distribution of Rs. 80,000/- among the parties, with Rs. 40,000/- each allocated to the 4th and 3rd defendants respectively. The court rejected claims of false statements and improper documentation, finding no grounds for further inquiry and dismissing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case