Baburao S/o Vithal Nadgeri Age 45 Years Occ Swachagar In Gram Panchayat R/o Kodal Hanagarga vs Shantamallappa S/o Sharanappa Nagade Age 65 Years Since Deceased Represented Through His Lrs — 5/2024
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th March 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAKB210000622024
e-Filing Number
25-02-2024
Filing Number
5/2024
Filing Date
26-Feb-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
27-Feb-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 07-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Baburao S/o Vithal Nadgeri Age 45 Years Occ Swachagar In Gram Panchayat R/o Kodal Hanagarga
Adv. Sureshchandra Annarao Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shantamallappa S/o Sharanappa Nagade Age 65 Years Since Deceased Represented Through His Lrs
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, rejecting the plaintiff's claim to ownership and possession of a disputed vacant plot. The court found that the plaintiff failed to produce credible evidence of ancestral ownership, inheritance, or actual possession, noting inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding property measurements and boundaries, absence of grant documents from the Gram Panchayat, and suspicious revenue records given the plaintiff's position as a Gram Panchayat employee. The defendants established superior title through revenue records showing ownership of adjacent land (Sy. No. 195/2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
19-Feb-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
02-Feb-2026
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
13-Jan-2026
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
11-Dec-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
21-Nov-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
06-Nov-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
17-Oct-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
20-Sep-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
23-Aug-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
13-Aug-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
06-Aug-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
23-Jul-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
05-Jun-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
16-Apr-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
21-Mar-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
01-Mar-2025
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
14-Feb-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
31-Jan-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
15-Jan-2025
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
14-Dec-2024
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
07-Nov-2024
A.D.R.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
15-Oct-2024
First Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
26-Sep-2024
First Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
20-Sep-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
04-Sep-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
21-Aug-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
07-Aug-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
25-Jul-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
09-Jul-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
27-Jun-2024
Arguments.
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
23-Apr-2024
Summons
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
27-Mar-2024
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge,aland
-
27-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 5/2024
Summary The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal and confirmed the trial court's judgment, rejecting the plaintiff's claim to ownership and possession of a disputed vacant plot. The court found that the plaintiff failed to produce credible evidence of ancestral ownership, inheritance, or actual possession, noting inconsistencies in witness testimonies regarding property measurements and boundaries, absence of grant documents from the Gram Panchayat, and suspicious revenue records given the plaintiff's position as a Gram Panchayat employee. The defendants established superior title through revenue records showing ownership of adjacent land (Sy. No. 195/2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts