Sufiya begum W/o Abdul Majeed, Age.65yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Near Mecca Masjid Akkalkot Dist.Solapur vs Syed Furkan Ali S/o Syed Khursheed Ali, Age.58yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Near SuiGumbad AsifcolonyKalaburgi — 3/2017
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 71. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB210000172017
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
2/2017
Filing Date
19-01-2017
Registration No
3/2017
Registration Date
19-01-2017
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sufiya begum W/o Abdul Majeed, Age.65yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Near Mecca Masjid Akkalkot Dist.Solapur
Adv. ANSARI WAHEED ASGAR
Talath begum W/o Abdul Rauf Valsangkaraged Age.63yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.MouaNo.A20 Par sidecolony Mumbi
Khaisar begum W/o Abdul Mohammad Arif, Age.60yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Mous No. A20 Park Side Colony Mumbai
Respondent(s)
Syed Furkan Ali S/o Syed Khursheed Ali, Age.58yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Near SuiGumbad AsifcolonyKalaburgi
Syed Irfan Ali S/o Syed Khursheed Ali, Age.55yrs, Occ.Agri, R/o.Ambewad Tq.Aland Dist.Kalaburagi(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
ARGUMENTS.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
| 13-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS. |
Interim Orders
The court examined documentary evidence (Exhibits 4-5 and 24 items marked as Exhibits 6-29) in O.S. No. 3/2017 during the hearing on 06.03.2026. The court found that the witness gave contradictory testimony regarding land ownership accounts, property records, and a sum of Rs. 50,000, ultimately holding that the witness gave false evidence on multiple material points in the case. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court examined documentary evidence (Exhibits 4-5 and 24 items marked as Exhibits 6-29) in O.S. No. 3/2017 during the hearing on 06.03.2026. The court found that the witness gave contradictory testimony regarding land ownership accounts, property records, and a sum of Rs. 50,000, ultimately holding that the witness gave false evidence on multiple material points in the case. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts