Nagendra S/o Basavannappa Biradar Age. 44 years Occ. Agriculture vs Pramod S/o Nagendra Biradar Age.5 years Minor U/g of his genetic mother Munni W/o Nagendra Biradar — 2/2023

Case under Sec151 Cpc Section U/oIXR7. Status: ARGUMENTS.. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

Misc - Miscellaneous Cases

CNR: KAKB210000162023

ARGUMENTS.

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

Filing Number

2/2023

Filing Date

07-01-2023

Registration No

2/2023

Registration Date

07-01-2023

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND

Judge

681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

Acts & Sections

Sec151 Cpc Section U/oIXR7

Petitioner(s)

Nagendra S/o Basavannappa Biradar Age. 44 years Occ. Agriculture

Adv. B A DESHPANDE

Respondent(s)

Pramod S/o Nagendra Biradar Age.5 years Minor U/g of his genetic mother Munni W/o Nagendra Biradar

Bhavani D/o Nagendra Biradar Age. 8 years Minor U/g of his genetic mother Munni W/o Nagendra Biradar

Munni W/o Nagendra Biradar Age. 34 years Occ. Agriculture

Hearing History

Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS.

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

11-02-2026

ARGUMENTS.

28-01-2026

ARGUMENTS.

Interim Orders

07-01-2023
Orders
12-01-2024
Deposition
05-03-2024
Deposition
24-04-2024
Deposition
04-07-2024
Deposition
09-08-2024
Deposition
23-09-2024
Deposition
11-02-2025
Deposition
25-03-2025
Deposition

The court order (C. Misc. No. 2/2023) dated 25.03.2025 addresses petitioner's contentions regarding a previous case (NIP-1). The court rejected the petitioner's arguments alleging fraud and false decrees, finding no merit in the claims that the husband was not properly served notice or that false evidence was submitted. The court ordered no further hearing on the matter and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court order (C. Misc. No. 2/2023) dated 25.03.2025 addresses petitioner's contentions regarding a previous case (NIP-1). The court rejected the petitioner's arguments alleging fraud and false decrees, finding no merit in the claims that the husband was not properly served notice or that false evidence was submitted. The court ordered no further hearing on the matter and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case