Manjushri D/o Hanamantraya Chichkote,Age 36 years,Occ Agriculture vs Godavari W/o Hanamantraya Chichkote,Age 57 years,Occ Agriculture, — 5/2024
Case under Sec151 Cpc Section 7,1. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAKB210000082024
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2024
Filing Number
4/2024
Filing Date
09-01-2024
Registration No
5/2024
Registration Date
11-01-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALAND
Judge
681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjushri D/o Hanamantraya Chichkote,Age 36 years,Occ Agriculture
Adv. B A DESHPANDE
Respondent(s)
Godavari W/o Hanamantraya Chichkote,Age 57 years,Occ Agriculture,
Mahananda W/o Nityanand Biradar,Age 38 years,Occ Agriculture
Swita Alias Sunanda W/o Sharanbasappa Biradar,Age 36 years,Occ Agriculture,
Mallikarjun S/o Hanamantraya Chichkote,Age 60 years,Occ Private Service
Hearing History
Judge: 681-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,ALAND
NOTICE
NOTICE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 29-01-2026 | NOTICE |
| 06-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 26-09-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 29-08-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order XVI Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitting her to file a list of witnesses in a partition suit. The court condoned the delay in filing the witness list, finding that the plaintiff requires sufficient opportunity to establish her claim regarding the ancestral character of suit properties, and that witness examination is vital to her case. The matter is adjourned to 29-08-2025 for further plaintiff evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application under Order XVI Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, permitting her to file a list of witnesses in a partition suit. The court condoned the delay in filing the witness list, finding that the plaintiff requires sufficient opportunity to establish her claim regarding the ancestral character of suit properties, and that witness examination is vital to her case. The matter is adjourned to 29-08-2025 for further plaintiff evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts