Tangevva W/o Bhimanna Sanshi vs Kamalavva W/o Fakkirappa Dharwad — 112/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U,S,26. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV710009202023
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
112/2023
Filing Date
12-07-2023
Registration No
112/2023
Registration Date
12-07-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIGGAON
Judge
1065-Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Shiggaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Tangevva W/o Bhimanna Sanshi
Adv. K.C.Patil
Respondent(s)
Kamalavva W/o Fakkirappa Dharwad
Nagavva W/o Dyamanna Dharwad
Manjula W/o Basappa Dharwad
Hearing History
Judge: 1065-Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Shiggaon
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is a civil court order (Original Case No. 112/2023) dated 26-09-2025 from a Kannada-language court. The judge found the plaintiff's witness testimony to be unreliable and contradictory regarding key facts in the dispute, particularly concerning the ages and relationships of the parties involved. The court rejected the witness's credibility due to inconsistencies in their account and ordered no further cross-examination, effectively dismissing the case based on insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil court order (Original Case No. 112/2023) dated 26-09-2025 from a Kannada-language court. The judge found the plaintiff's witness testimony to be unreliable and contradictory regarding key facts in the dispute, particularly concerning the ages and relationships of the parties involved. The court rejected the witness's credibility due to inconsistencies in their account and ordered no further cross-examination, effectively dismissing the case based on insufficient evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts