Mylarappa S.O Neelappa Bankapur vs Neelappa S.O Mallappa Bankapur — 25/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV710001102020
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
25/2020
Filing Date
06-06-2020
Registration No
25/2020
Registration Date
06-06-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SHIGGAON
Judge
1065-Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Shiggaon
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mylarappa S.O Neelappa Bankapur
Adv. Sri V.B Turakani
Smt. Malllavva Urf Purneema W.O Galeppa Doddapujar
Respondent(s)
Neelappa S.O Mallappa Bankapur
Malatesh Urf Mantesh S.O Neelappa Bankapur
Smt. Hanmavva W.o Neelappa Bankapur
Smt. Ratnavva W.O Laxman Katagi
Smt. Somantavva W.O Nagappa Kambali
Heggeppa S.O Mallappa Bankapur
Ningappa S.O Mallappa Bankapur
Guddappa S.O Mallappa Bankapur
Basavanthappa S.O Mallappa Bankapur
Hearing History
Judge: 1065-Senior Civil Judge And JMFC Shiggaon
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
objection
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-01-2026 | objection |
| 17-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In Original Suit No. 25/2020, the court recorded witness testimony on 01-08-2025. After examining evidence regarding property ownership and inheritance disputes between the plaintiffs and defendants, the court found that the disputed properties were self-acquired assets of the deceased (plaintiff no. 1's husband), not joint family property. The case proceeds with further examination of witnesses and evidence regarding property partition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Original Suit No. 25/2020, the court recorded witness testimony on 01-08-2025. After examining evidence regarding property ownership and inheritance disputes between the plaintiffs and defendants, the court found that the disputed properties were self-acquired assets of the deceased (plaintiff no. 1's husband), not joint family property. The case proceeds with further examination of witnesses and evidence regarding property partition claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts