Halaswamy S/o Prabhayya Alias Prakashayya Chigarimath vs Pushpa W/o Shivanandayya Chigarimath — 160/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section U,S,26. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV700012852023
Next Hearing
13th March 2026
Filing Number
174/2023
Filing Date
01-08-2023
Registration No
160/2023
Registration Date
01-08-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, SHIGGAON
Judge
362-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Halaswamy S/o Prabhayya Alias Prakashayya Chigarimath
Adv. K. C. Patil
Savita W/o Prasanna K.M.
Respondent(s)
Pushpa W/o Shivanandayya Chigarimath
Darshan S/o Shivanandayya Chigarimath
Rekha W/o Somalingayya Chigarimath
Kumari Kavita D/o Somalingayya Chigarimath
Naveen S/o Somalingayya Chigarimath
Hearing History
Judge: 362-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 05-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 03-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 28-02-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY The Civil Judge of Shiggaon rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction (IA No.I) seeking to restrain defendants from interfering with their possession of ancestral properties. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience did not favor them, and no irreparable loss would result from denial of the injunction, particularly given that a High Court order in a related appeal (RSA No.100881/2024) already directed maintenance of status quo on the same properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY The Civil Judge of Shiggaon rejected the plaintiffs' application for interim injunction (IA No.I) seeking to restrain defendants from interfering with their possession of ancestral properties. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, the balance of convenience did not favor them, and no irreparable loss would result from denial of the injunction, particularly given that a High Court order in a related appeal (RSA No.100881/2024) already directed maintenance of status quo on the same properties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts