Jaheerahmed Mahammedgous Lohar Age 42 yrs R/o Bahosh Nagar Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 417/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600023762025
Filing Number
417/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
417/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jaheerahmed Mahammedgous Lohar Age 42 yrs R/o Bahosh Nagar Savanur Dist Haveri
Adv. P.R.KALAL.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
12-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The Court of the Civil Judge & JMFC, Savanur rejected the compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendant dated 04-12-2025. The court found that while an oral gift (Hiba) under Muslim personal law may be valid, it cannot override statutory restrictions under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. The compromise sought to divide agricultural land into fragments below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by a 2021 notification, which would create unauthorized layouts contrary to public interest and planning regulations. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 417/2025
Summary: The Court of the Civil Judge & JMFC, Savanur rejected the compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendant dated 04-12-2025. The court found that while an oral gift (Hiba) under Muslim personal law may be valid, it cannot override statutory restrictions under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964. The compromise sought to divide agricultural land into fragments below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by a 2021 notification, which would create unauthorized layouts contrary to public interest and planning regulations. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts