Naginabanu Mahamedgous Mattikatti Age 30 yrs R/o Khadarbag Oni Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 413/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600023722025

HEARING

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

413/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

413/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3

Petitioner(s)

Naginabanu Mahamedgous Mattikatti Age 30 yrs R/o Khadarbag Oni Savanur Dist Haveri

Adv. P.R.KALAL.

Respondent(s)

Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

Hearing History

Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING

18-12-2025

HEARING

12-12-2025

HEARING

04-12-2025

HEARING

09-10-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

12-12-2025
Orders

Summary: The compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiff Naginabanu and defendant Syed Mir on 04-12-2025 has been rejected. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC because it sought to validate the fragmentation of agricultural land (Sy.No.513*/1) into small portions below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 notification (dated 07-12-2021), which violates statutory protections against unauthorized layouts and unregulated development. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiff Naginabanu and defendant Syed Mir on 04-12-2025 has been rejected. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC because it sought to validate the fragmentation of agricultural land (Sy.No.513*/1) into small portions below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 notification (dated 07-12-2021), which violates statutory protections against unauthorized layouts and unregulated development. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case