Naginabanu Mahamedgous Mattikatti Age 30 yrs R/o Khadarbag Oni Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 413/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 06-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600023722025

Filing Number

413/2025

Filing Date

09-Oct-2025

Registration No

413/2025

Registration Date

09-Oct-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naginabanu Mahamedgous Mattikatti Age 30 yrs R/o Khadarbag Oni Savanur Dist Haveri

    Adv. P.R.KALAL.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

Case History

  1. 06-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  3. 18-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  4. 12-Dec-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiff Naginabanu and defendant Syed Mir on 04-12-2025 has been rejected. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC because it sought to validate the fragmentation of agricultural land (Sy.No.513*/1) into small portions below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 notification (dated 07-12-2021), which violates statutory protections against unauthorized layouts and unregulated development. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 12-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  7. 09-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 413/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The compromise petition filed jointly by plaintiff Naginabanu and defendant Syed Mir on 04-12-2025 has been rejected. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC because it sought to validate the fragmentation of agricultural land (Sy.No.513*/1) into small portions below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 notification (dated 07-12-2021), which violates statutory protections against unauthorized layouts and unregulated development. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case