Imtiyaz Ahamed Najeerahamed Dukanadar Age 42 yrs R/o Gundur Tq Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 412/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600023712025
Filing Number
412/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
412/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Imtiyaz Ahamed Najeerahamed Dukanadar Age 42 yrs R/o Gundur Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Adv. P.R.KALAL.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sayyadmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
12-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
The Civil Judge & JMFC, Savanur rejected the compromise petition filed by plaintiff Imtiyaz Ahmad and defendant Syed Mir dated 04-12-2025. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC as it sought judicial recognition of agricultural land fragmentation below the statutory minimum of 5 guntas, contrary to the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 notification and public interest in preventing unauthorized layouts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 412/2025
The Civil Judge & JMFC, Savanur rejected the compromise petition filed by plaintiff Imtiyaz Ahmad and defendant Syed Mir dated 04-12-2025. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC as it sought judicial recognition of agricultural land fragmentation below the statutory minimum of 5 guntas, contrary to the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 notification and public interest in preventing unauthorized layouts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts