Ahamed Modinsab Chopadar Age 64 yrs R/o Khadarbag Oni Savanur vs Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 410/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,3. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600023692025

HEARING

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

410/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

410/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,3

Petitioner(s)

Ahamed Modinsab Chopadar Age 64 yrs R/o Khadarbag Oni Savanur

Adv. P.R.KALAL.

Respondent(s)

Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

Hearing History

Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING

18-12-2025

HEARING

12-12-2025

HEARING

04-12-2025

HEARING

09-10-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

12-12-2025
Orders

SUMMARY: The Civil Judge rejected the compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendant dated 04-12-2025. The court held that while oral gifts (Hiba) are valid under Muslim personal law, the compromise sought judicial recognition of agricultural land fragmentation that violates the Karnataka Land Revenue Act's 2021 Notification prohibiting creation of survey numbers for agricultural land below 5 guntas. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC as it would indirectly facilitate unauthorized layouts and defeat statutory protections against unregulated development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Civil Judge rejected the compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendant dated 04-12-2025. The court held that while oral gifts (Hiba) are valid under Muslim personal law, the compromise sought judicial recognition of agricultural land fragmentation that violates the Karnataka Land Revenue Act's 2021 Notification prohibiting creation of survey numbers for agricultural land below 5 guntas. The court found the compromise unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC as it would indirectly facilitate unauthorized layouts and defeat statutory protections against unregulated development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case