Kalilahammed Abdulrajak Danebag Age 47 yrs R/o Yalavigi Tq Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 409/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600023682025
Filing Number
409/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
409/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kalilahammed Abdulrajak Danebag Age 47 yrs R/o Yalavigi Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Adv. P.R.KALAL.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
12-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S.No.409/2025 Outcome: Compromise Petition Rejected The Civil Judge rejected the joint compromise petition filed by both parties on 04-12-2025, finding it unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court held that accepting the compromise would indirectly validate the fragmentation of agricultural land into very small parcels below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by the Karnataka Land Revenue Act notification (07-12-2021), thereby facilitating unauthorized layouts contrary to public interest and urban planning regulations. The suit for permanent injunction continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 409/2025
Case Summary: O.S.No.409/2025 Outcome: Compromise Petition Rejected The Civil Judge rejected the joint compromise petition filed by both parties on 04-12-2025, finding it unlawful under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC. The court held that accepting the compromise would indirectly validate the fragmentation of agricultural land into very small parcels below the 5-gunta minimum prescribed by the Karnataka Land Revenue Act notification (07-12-2021), thereby facilitating unauthorized layouts contrary to public interest and urban planning regulations. The suit for permanent injunction continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts