Rabbani Mahammedjafar Farash Age 25 yrs R/o Khadriya Nagar Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 407/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600023662025

HEARING

Next Hearing

06th June 2026

Filing Number

407/2025

Filing Date

09-10-2025

Registration No

407/2025

Registration Date

09-10-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3

Petitioner(s)

Rabbani Mahammedjafar Farash Age 25 yrs R/o Khadriya Nagar Savanur Dist Haveri

Adv. P.R.KALAL.

Respondent(s)

Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

Hearing History

Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING

18-12-2025

HEARING

12-12-2025

HEARING

04-12-2025

HEARING

09-10-2025

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

12-12-2025
Orders

Case Summary Outcome: Compromise petition dismissed/rejected The Civil Judge rejected the compromise petition filed by plaintiff Rabbani and defendant Syed Mir in O.S. No. 407/2025. The court found that while an oral gift (Hiba) under Muslim personal law may be valid, the compromise sought to record fragmentation of agricultural land into plots smaller than 5 guntas, which violates the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and a 2021 statutory notification prohibiting such subdivision. The court held that no lawful compromise could be recorded that would indirectly validate unauthorized layouts and defeat land conservation regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Outcome: Compromise petition dismissed/rejected The Civil Judge rejected the compromise petition filed by plaintiff Rabbani and defendant Syed Mir in O.S. No. 407/2025. The court found that while an oral gift (Hiba) under Muslim personal law may be valid, the compromise sought to record fragmentation of agricultural land into plots smaller than 5 guntas, which violates the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 and a 2021 statutory notification prohibiting such subdivision. The court held that no lawful compromise could be recorded that would indirectly validate unauthorized layouts and defeat land conservation regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case