Hajaresab Goususab Karjagi Age 37 yrs R/o Karadagi Tq Savanur Dist Haveri vs Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 406/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7.1.3. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600023652025
Filing Number
406/2025
Filing Date
09-Oct-2025
Registration No
406/2025
Registration Date
09-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Hajaresab Goususab Karjagi Age 37 yrs R/o Karadagi Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Adv. P.R.KALAL.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sayyedmeera Abdulkhadar Narayanapur Age 80 yrs R/o Chandani Nagar Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
12-Dec-2025
OrdersView PDF
Summary The Civil Judge and JMFC, Savanur rejected the compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendant on 04-12-2025. The court found that the compromise, which sought to recognize an oral gift (Hiba) of agricultural land portions, violated statutory restrictions under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, specifically a 2021 notification prohibiting fragmentation of agricultural land below 5 guntas. The court held that allowing such compromise would indirectly validate unauthorized layouts and defeat public interest in regulated development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge and JMFC
-
09-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 406/2025
Summary The Civil Judge and JMFC, Savanur rejected the compromise petition filed jointly by the plaintiff and defendant on 04-12-2025. The court found that the compromise, which sought to recognize an oral gift (Hiba) of agricultural land portions, violated statutory restrictions under the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, specifically a 2021 notification prohibiting fragmentation of agricultural land below 5 guntas. The court held that allowing such compromise would indirectly validate unauthorized layouts and defeat public interest in regulated development. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts