Krishnappa Bhajanappa Lamani Age 43 yrs R/o Shevalalpur Tq Savanur Dist Haveri vs The State of Karnataka R/by Deputy Commissioner D.C.Office Devagiri Haveri — 390/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,1,3. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600022792025
Next Hearing
17th March 2026
Filing Number
390/2025
Filing Date
20-09-2025
Registration No
390/2025
Registration Date
20-09-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Krishnappa Bhajanappa Lamani Age 43 yrs R/o Shevalalpur Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
Adv. I B Hurakadli
Respondent(s)
The State of Karnataka R/by Deputy Commissioner D.C.Office Devagiri Haveri
The Deputy director public instructions Haveri Tq and Dist Haveri
The Block Education Officer BEO Office Savanur Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
The Head Master Govt.Higher Primary School Shirabadagi Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
The Head Master Govt High School Shirabadagi Tq Savanur Dist Haveri
The RTO Haveri Tq and Dist Haveri
Hearing History
Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
ISSUES
ISSUES
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 19-02-2026 | ISSUES |
| 30-01-2026 | Written Statement |
| 17-12-2025 | Written Statement |
| 06-11-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application under Section 80(2) CPC to dispense with the mandatory statutory notice to defendants and permitted institution of the suit. The plaintiff sought a declaration of name and mandatory injunction, citing urgency due to applying for a KSRTC driver position. The court accepted this reasoning and directed the office to institute the suit, with summons to be issued to defendants upon payment of court fees and next hearing on 06-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application under Section 80(2) CPC to dispense with the mandatory statutory notice to defendants and permitted institution of the suit. The plaintiff sought a declaration of name and mandatory injunction, citing urgency due to applying for a KSRTC driver position. The court accepted this reasoning and directed the office to institute the suit, with summons to be issued to defendants upon payment of court fees and next hearing on 06-11-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts