Akkamahadevi Akkamma Wo Suresh Shirahatti vs Basaravaja Shivappa Kundur — 288/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600017692015
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
288/2015
Filing Date
17-12-2015
Registration No
288/2015
Registration Date
17-12-2015
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Akkamahadevi Akkamma Wo Suresh Shirahatti
Adv. N S PATIL
Respondent(s)
Basaravaja Shivappa Kundur
Channappa Shivappa Kundur
Chandrashekar Shivappa Kundur
Smt. Parvatevva @ Gangavva Shivappa Kundur
Khadarsab Nabisab Jakati
Smt. Kamalavva Wo Basavaraj Kundur
Hearing History
Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Written Statement
ISSUES
Written Statement
Written Statement
Await further orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Written Statement |
| 06-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 27-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 21-02-2026 | Written Statement |
| 05-02-2026 | Await further orders |
Interim Orders
The court allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No.10) to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, permitting her to add contentions regarding a prior decree from OS No.34/1985. The court held that procedural rules serve justice and amendments cannot be refused merely due to negligence or technical infractions, especially when the amendment is necessary to determine the real controversy between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the plaintiff's application (IA No.10) to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC, permitting her to add contentions regarding a prior decree from OS No.34/1985. The court held that procedural rules serve justice and amendments cannot be refused merely due to negligence or technical infractions, especially when the amendment is necessary to determine the real controversy between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts