Basavaraj Yallappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar vs Hanumantappa Yallappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar — 229/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600014982021
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
Filing Number
229/2021
Filing Date
04-10-2021
Registration No
229/2021
Registration Date
04-10-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Basavaraj Yallappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Adv. C.S.MANDENAVAR
Ratnavva Parasappa Saunshi
Respondent(s)
Hanumantappa Yallappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Yallavva Nakalappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Suresh Nakalappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Madevappa Nakalappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Lakshmavva urf Lakshmi Putrappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Sahana Putrappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Sanjana Putrappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Manjunath Putrappa Gonagi urf Gonagiyavar
Drashayani Neelappa Sokati
Fakkirappa Ramappa Yattin
Manjunath Basavaraj Unakal
Hearing History
Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
NOTICE
NOTICE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 06-02-2026 | NOTICE |
| 19-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 229/2021 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff has not established a valid legal claim regarding the disputed property (identified as plot No. 47/3). The court determined there are insufficient grounds to grant relief, as the ownership and rights over the property could not be definitively established in favor of the petitioner based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 229/2021 Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff has not established a valid legal claim regarding the disputed property (identified as plot No. 47/3). The court determined there are insufficient grounds to grant relief, as the ownership and rights over the property could not be definitively established in favor of the petitioner based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts