Basavaraj Channabasappa Havanagi vs Shiddappa Panchappa Havanagi — 283/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600012392014

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

285/2014

Filing Date

20-11-2014

Registration No

283/2014

Registration Date

20-11-2014

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

Basavaraj Channabasappa Havanagi

Adv. SRI.V.B.TURAKANI

Danamma Shiddalingappa Havanagi

Deepa Sangamesh Vaijapur

Shilpa Shiddalingappa Havanagi

Respondent(s)

Shiddappa Panchappa Havanagi

Hearing History

Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

26-02-2026

EVIDENCE

19-02-2026

EVIDENCE

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

30-09-2015
Issue
27-01-2016
Deposition
26-08-2016
Orders
26-08-2016
Issue
19-09-2022
Orders
05-08-2023
Orders
17-12-2025
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
19-02-2026
Deposition

Summary In OS No. 283/2014, the court addressed a property dispute involving Sections 126 and 127 of a law (dated 06-09-1965, No. 3377). The court examined claims regarding property ownership and succession rights, considering documents filed in 1968 and 1974. The petition filed in 2012 was disposed of with the court holding that the necessary evidence and documentation were not properly presented, and accordingly dismissed the claims of the parties for want of sufficient proof regarding their alleged rights to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In OS No. 283/2014, the court addressed a property dispute involving Sections 126 and 127 of a law (dated 06-09-1965, No. 3377). The court examined claims regarding property ownership and succession rights, considering documents filed in 1968 and 1974. The petition filed in 2012 was disposed of with the court holding that the necessary evidence and documentation were not properly presented, and accordingly dismissed the claims of the parties for want of sufficient proof regarding their alleged rights to the property in question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case