The Excise Savanur PS vs Prakash Shivamurteppa Barki — 520/2023

Case under Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section U/s11,14,32(1),34,38(A),43(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Jul-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV600010232023

Filing Number

520/2023

Filing Date

04-Aug-2023

Registration No

520/2023

Registration Date

04-Aug-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act 1965 Section U/s11,14,32(1),34,38(A),43(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Excise Savanur PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP Savanur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Shivamurteppa Barki

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  3. 23-May-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  6. 15-Dec-2025

    Deposition

    Summary of Case 520/2023 Court: First Additional District Judge, Savanur Date: 15-12-2025 Parties: Excise Savanur PS vs. Prakash Shivamurteppa Barki (age 59) Outcome: The court dismissed the petition. The respondent's statements to police were recorded under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court found no violation of the respondent's rights and rejected arguments that evidence was improperly obtained. Witness examination proceeded as scheduled (6:45-7:45 AM), and statements from Accused-1 and the respondent were properly recorded. The case proceedings continue with examination of witnesses under Section 2(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Deposition

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  10. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  12. 13-May-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  13. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  14. 28-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  15. 03-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  16. 07-Oct-2024

    Charge

  17. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  18. 27-Aug-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  19. 26-Aug-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  20. 16-Jul-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  21. 26-Jun-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  22. 21-May-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  23. 18-Mar-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  24. 10-Jan-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  25. 11-Dec-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  26. 26-Sep-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  27. 05-Sep-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  28. 04-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 04-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 520/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 520/2023 Court: First Additional District Judge, Savanur Date: 15-12-2025 Parties: Excise Savanur PS vs. Prakash Shivamurteppa Barki (age 59) Outcome: The court dismissed the petition. The respondent's statements to police were recorded under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. The court found no violation of the respondent's rights and rejected arguments that evidence was improperly obtained. Witness examination proceeded as scheduled (6:45-7:45 AM), and statements from Accused-1 and the respondent were properly recorded. The case proceedings continue with examination of witnesses under Section 2(b) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case