Ulavayya S/o Channabasayya Hiremath Agae 50 yrs R/o Kalakoti Tq Savanur Dist Haveri vs Kotrayya S/o Shekhayya Mathad Urf Hiremath Age 45 yrs R/o Kalakoti Tq Savanur Dist Haveri — 173/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1and3. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600008702025

Filing Number

175/2025

Filing Date

03-May-2025

Registration No

173/2025

Registration Date

03-May-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL Judge and JMFC

Last updated 13-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1and3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ulavayya S/o Channabasayya Hiremath Agae 50 yrs R/o Kalakoti Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

    Adv. G.M.MARIGOUDAR

  2. 2.Nirmala W/o Manjayya Mulimani Aliyas Nirmala D/o Channabasayya Hiremath R/o Kalakoti Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kotrayya S/o Shekhayya Mathad Urf Hiremath Age 45 yrs R/o Kalakoti Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

  2. 2.Renukswavami S/o Shekhayya Mathad Urf Hiremath Age 43 yrs R/o Kalakoti Tq Savanur Dist Haveri

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  5. 05-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  6. 18-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  7. 06-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  8. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge and JMFC

  10. 03-May-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: The court denied the ex-parte temporary injunction requested by plaintiffs seeking to restrain defendants from obstructing access to a cart road. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they relied only on photographs and property records without producing reliable documentary evidence (such as village maps) proving the cart road's existence on defendants' land. The case is adjourned to 25-06-2025, with emergent notice and suit summons to be issued to defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 03-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court denied the ex-parte temporary injunction requested by plaintiffs seeking to restrain defendants from obstructing access to a cart road. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, as they relied only on photographs and property records without producing reliable documentary evidence (such as village maps) proving the cart road's existence on defendants' land. The case is adjourned to 25-06-2025, with emergent notice and suit summons to be issued to defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case