Narasanagouda Chandragouda Patil vs Tippanna Mariyappa Madar Urf Harijan — 303/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600008032019

HEARING

Next Hearing

17th April 2026

Filing Number

303/2019

Filing Date

30-10-2019

Registration No

303/2019

Registration Date

30-10-2019

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc

Petitioner(s)

Narasanagouda Chandragouda Patil

Adv. SRI.V.B.TURAKANI

Respondent(s)

Tippanna Mariyappa Madar Urf Harijan

Fakkeerappa Mariyappa Madar Urf Harijan

Yellappa Mariyappa Madar Urf Harijan

Hearing History

Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING

06-02-2026

HEARING

30-01-2026

Objection

24-01-2026

NULL

11-12-2025

NULL

Interim Orders

29-07-2022
Deposition
03-03-2023
Deposition
24-03-2023
Deposition
03-06-2021
Issue
23-06-2023
Deposition
20-07-2023
Deposition
03-06-2021
Issue
08-02-2024
Deposition
19-07-2024
Deposition
13-09-2024
Deposition
08-11-2024
Deposition
20-12-2024
Deposition
28-02-2025
Deposition
20-11-2025
Orders

SUMMARY: The Civil Judge allowed both interim applications (IA-X and IA-XI) filed by the plaintiff with compensatory costs of Rs. 300 each. IA-X permitted production of documents, while IA-XI allowed amendment of the plaint to correct the property survey number from Sy.no.79/2A to Sy.no.79/2 (measuring 07 Acres 07 guntas) based on updated revenue records, without altering property boundaries or the suit's nature. The court found the amendment necessary for effective adjudication and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The Civil Judge allowed both interim applications (IA-X and IA-XI) filed by the plaintiff with compensatory costs of Rs. 300 each. IA-X permitted production of documents, while IA-XI allowed amendment of the plaint to correct the property survey number from Sy.no.79/2A to Sy.no.79/2 (measuring 07 Acres 07 guntas) based on updated revenue records, without altering property boundaries or the suit's nature. The court found the amendment necessary for effective adjudication and to prevent multiplicity of proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case