Sainaz Hazarat Nadaf vs Zahangirsab Hazaresab Nadaf — 168/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV600006742015

Objection

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

168/2015

Filing Date

20-07-2015

Registration No

168/2015

Registration Date

20-07-2015

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR

Judge

361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

Sainaz Hazarat Nadaf

Adv. S T Patil

Zubeda Hazaresab Nadaf

Respondent(s)

Zahangirsab Hazaresab Nadaf

Kabeersab Hazaresab Nadaf

Hearing History

Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC

06-03-2026

Objection

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

17-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

07-02-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

01-07-2019
Deposition
20-09-2019
Deposition
08-11-2021
Deposition
18-02-2022
Deposition
12-10-2022
Deposition
22-01-2018
Issue
28-07-2023
Deposition
01-09-2023
Deposition
15-02-2024
Deposition
25-04-2024
Deposition
07-02-2025
Deposition
03-05-2025
Deposition
03-05-2025
Deposition
20-06-2025
Deposition
26-09-2025
Deposition
17-02-2026
Orders

Case Summary OS No.168/2015 - Civil Judge & JMFC, Savanur The court rejected the defendants' application (IA-XVI) seeking appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the suit property. The court held that since both parties had completed their oral evidence and the matter was posted for arguments, appointing a commissioner to verify the existence of a shed or determine boundaries would constitute collection of fresh evidence, which is impermissible at this advanced stage of proceedings in an injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary OS No.168/2015 - Civil Judge & JMFC, Savanur The court rejected the defendants' application (IA-XVI) seeking appointment of a court commissioner to inspect the suit property. The court held that since both parties had completed their oral evidence and the matter was posted for arguments, appointing a commissioner to verify the existence of a shed or determine boundaries would constitute collection of fresh evidence, which is impermissible at this advanced stage of proceedings in an injunction suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case