Fakkirappa Ningappa Chapparad vs Neelappa Ningappa Chapparad — 117/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section CPC. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV600003252019
Next Hearing
04th April 2026
Filing Number
117/2019
Filing Date
22-04-2019
Registration No
117/2019
Registration Date
22-04-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAVANUR
Judge
361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Fakkirappa Ningappa Chapparad
Adv. P.R.KALAL.
Respondent(s)
Neelappa Ningappa Chapparad
Hearing History
Judge: 361-CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: This Original Suit (OS) No. 117/2019 concerns a property dispute involving land boundaries and measurements. The court examined the plaintiff's claims regarding 1 acre 36 gunthas of land in the northern direction and compared it with defendant's land measuring 3 acres 34 gunthas, ultimately determining the actual boundaries and usage rights of the disputed portions. The court directed that certain boundaries be marked and established according to the survey findings, with the case scheduled for further proceedings in 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This Original Suit (OS) No. 117/2019 concerns a property dispute involving land boundaries and measurements. The court examined the plaintiff's claims regarding 1 acre 36 gunthas of land in the northern direction and compared it with defendant's land measuring 3 acres 34 gunthas, ultimately determining the actual boundaries and usage rights of the disputed portions. The court directed that certain boundaries be marked and established according to the survey findings, with the case scheduled for further proceedings in 2020. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts