Manjunath S/o Hanumantappa Huddar vs D.1.Shekaragouda S/o Timmanagouda Gudisalakopp — 344/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1&2RWS26. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV520013832024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

344/2024

Filing Date

16-10-2024

Registration No

344/2024

Registration Date

16-10-2024

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR

Judge

359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1&2RWS26

Petitioner(s)

Manjunath S/o Hanumantappa Huddar

Adv. S.A.Kulkarni

Respondent(s)

D.1.Shekaragouda S/o Timmanagouda Gudisalakopp

D.2.Mallanagouda S/o Hanumantagoud Gudisalakopp

D.3.Naganagouda S/o Channabasanagouda Gudisalakopp

D.4.Bhimanagouda S/o Chennabasanagouda Gudisalakoppa

D.5.Guddanagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Gudisalakoppa

D.6.Parasanagouda S/o Bhimanagouda Gudisalakoppa

Hearing History

Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

18-02-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

16-12-2025

EVIDENCE

01-12-2025

LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS

Interim Orders

01-12-2025
Orders
01-12-2025
Issue
18-02-2026
Deposition

This is a civil court order (O.S. No. 344/2024) from a Kannada-language court dated 18-02-2026. The court admitted witness testimony under oath and marked various documents (property-related records, mutations, digital certificates, and orders from 1982-2026) as evidence exhibits. The respondent's counsel requested time for cross-examination, which was granted; no further hearing was scheduled on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil court order (O.S. No. 344/2024) from a Kannada-language court dated 18-02-2026. The court admitted witness testimony under oath and marked various documents (property-related records, mutations, digital certificates, and orders from 1982-2026) as evidence exhibits. The respondent's counsel requested time for cross-examination, which was granted; no further hearing was scheduled on that date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case