Suresh S/o Yallappa Nagenahalli vs Revanasiddappa S/o Yallappa Nagenahalli Advocate - UDD — 60/2022
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV520007352022
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
59/2022
Filing Date
23-03-2022
Registration No
60/2022
Registration Date
23-03-2022
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh S/o Yallappa Nagenahalli
Adv. S.R.SAWKAR
Respondent(s)
Revanasiddappa S/o Yallappa Nagenahalli Advocate - UDD
Hearing History
Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary OS No. 60/2022 - Property Dispute (Dated 01-12-2025) The court heard witness testimony in this property dispute case involving a 6-acre land sale (sold for ₹5,55,000). The court found that the plaintiff made fraudulent representations using false information to execute the sale deed in her name, with no documentary evidence supporting her financial contribution. The court concluded that the plaintiff has no legal rights to the disputed property, as the entire purchase money was provided by the defendant, and dismissed the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary OS No. 60/2022 - Property Dispute (Dated 01-12-2025) The court heard witness testimony in this property dispute case involving a 6-acre land sale (sold for ₹5,55,000). The court found that the plaintiff made fraudulent representations using false information to execute the sale deed in her name, with no documentary evidence supporting her financial contribution. The court concluded that the plaintiff has no legal rights to the disputed property, as the entire purchase money was provided by the defendant, and dismissed the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts