Sofiyabhi W/o Mahamadyusuf Saheb vs Siddappa Jamalappa Kanakeri Advocate - K.N.D. — 116/2021

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc. Status: JUDGMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV520007072021

JUDGMENTS

Next Hearing

26th March 2026

Filing Number

116/2021

Filing Date

23-04-2021

Registration No

116/2021

Registration Date

23-04-2021

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR

Judge

359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 R/w Sec 26 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Sofiyabhi W/o Mahamadyusuf Saheb

Adv. N.V.Chapparad

Jameer Ahamad S/o Mahamad Yusuf Saheb Teredahalli

Imtiyaj Mahamad Yusuf Saheb Teredahalli

Respondent(s)

Siddappa Jamalappa Kanakeri Advocate - K.N.D.

Mangala W/o Manjappa Kanakeri

Adv. K.N.D.

Vinayak S/o Manjappa Kanakeri

Adv. K.N.D.

Rupa S/o Manjappa Kanakeri

Adv. K.N.D.

Puttaraju S/o Manjappa Kanakeri

Adv. K.N.D.

Hearing History

Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

06-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

17-02-2026

JUDGMENTS

11-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

29-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

08-10-2021
Deposition
20-12-2021
Deposition
06-07-2022
Issue
14-06-2023
Deposition
05-07-2023
Deposition
23-11-2023
Deposition
05-01-2024
Deposition
30-05-2024
Deposition
04-07-2025
Deposition
07-11-2025
Deposition
17-12-2025
Deposition

Summary In O.S. No. 116/2021 dated 17-12-2025, the court examined a land dispute involving Survey No. 757 (totaling 14 acres 26 guntas) divided among three parties. The court found the plaintiff's witness testimony unreliable and noted procedural issues with the earlier survey conducted on 23-12-2019. The case is adjourned for further inquiry regarding the true ownership and boundaries of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In O.S. No. 116/2021 dated 17-12-2025, the court examined a land dispute involving Survey No. 757 (totaling 14 acres 26 guntas) divided among three parties. The court found the plaintiff's witness testimony unreliable and noted procedural issues with the earlier survey conducted on 23-12-2019. The case is adjourned for further inquiry regarding the true ownership and boundaries of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case