Vevalibai W/o Isranaik vs Puttanaik Lamani Bin Kubyappa Lamani Advocate - K.G.F. — 114/2021
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV520007042021
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
114/2021
Filing Date
23-04-2021
Registration No
114/2021
Registration Date
23-04-2021
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vevalibai W/o Isranaik
Adv. C.Angadi
Nagyanaik Bin Late Isranaik
Fakkiranaik Bin Isranaik
Sheshibai W/o late Badiyanaik
Ratnibai W/o late Lachchnaik
Lokesh Bin late Lachchanaik
Dhanraj Bin late Lachchanaik
Kalanaik Bin Badiyanaik
Ganeshnaik Bin Badiyanaik
Peeranaik Bin Badiyanaik
Respondent(s)
Puttanaik Lamani Bin Kubyappa Lamani Advocate - K.G.F.
Gooribai Bin Kubya Sakyappa Lamani
Adv. K.G.F.
Krishtnanaik Bin Peeranaik
Adv. M.K.I.
Sarojabai Bin Peeranaik
Adv. Exparte
Peeribai W/o Fakirappa
Parameshwarnaik Bin Puttappa Kubyappa Lamani
Adv. K.G.F.
Hearing History
Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 08-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This is an OS (Original Suit) No. 114/2021 regarding a property dispute. The court heard witnesses on 04-12-2025 and found the disputed property to be ancestral/paternal property (inherited from 1939 onwards, remaining in the father's name until 1978). The court determined that plaintiffs 1-4 each hold 1/12 share and plaintiffs 5-7 each hold 1/12 share in the property, and ordered further proceedings with additional witness examination to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is an OS (Original Suit) No. 114/2021 regarding a property dispute. The court heard witnesses on 04-12-2025 and found the disputed property to be ancestral/paternal property (inherited from 1939 onwards, remaining in the father's name until 1978). The court determined that plaintiffs 1-4 each hold 1/12 share and plaintiffs 5-7 each hold 1/12 share in the property, and ordered further proceedings with additional witness examination to continue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts