P.1.Prabhu S/o Tirakappa Melmuri vs D.1.Dadapeer S/o Shabbirahammad Bavikatti Advocate - K.G.Sannamani — 132/2023
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV520003382023
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
132/2023
Filing Date
05-06-2023
Registration No
132/2023
Registration Date
05-06-2023
Court
PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.1.Prabhu S/o Tirakappa Melmuri
Adv. M.B.Goudappagoudra
Respondent(s)
D.1.Dadapeer S/o Shabbirahammad Bavikatti Advocate - K.G.Sannamani
D.2.Irfan S/o Shabbeerahammad Bavikatti
Adv. K.G.Sannamani
Hearing History
Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: O.S. No. 132/2023 Order Date: 18-02-2026 Outcome: The case was heard with witness examination on oath. The court found that the defendants' claim to the disputed joint property is not supported by documentary evidence. The deed (NP-9) executed on 29.11.2012 did not mention a common road/right-of-way on the eastern side, and necessary parties were not made co-parties in the suit. The court concluded that the joint property belongs to the defendants' mother's house, not as a common asset, based on oral agreement between the parties. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: O.S. No. 132/2023 Order Date: 18-02-2026 Outcome: The case was heard with witness examination on oath. The court found that the defendants' claim to the disputed joint property is not supported by documentary evidence. The deed (NP-9) executed on 29.11.2012 did not mention a common road/right-of-way on the eastern side, and necessary parties were not made co-parties in the suit. The court concluded that the joint property belongs to the defendants' mother's house, not as a common asset, based on oral agreement between the parties. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts