P.1.Prabhu S/o Tirakappa Melmuri vs D.1.Dadapeer S/o Shabbirahammad Bavikatti Advocate - K.G.Sannamani — 132/2023

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV520003382023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

132/2023

Filing Date

05-06-2023

Registration No

132/2023

Registration Date

05-06-2023

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR

Judge

359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

P.1.Prabhu S/o Tirakappa Melmuri

Adv. M.B.Goudappagoudra

Respondent(s)

D.1.Dadapeer S/o Shabbirahammad Bavikatti Advocate - K.G.Sannamani

D.2.Irfan S/o Shabbeerahammad Bavikatti

Adv. K.G.Sannamani

Hearing History

Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

18-02-2026

EVIDENCE

28-01-2026

EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE

27-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

05-06-2023
Orders
22-04-2025
Orders
22-04-2025
Issue
19-06-2025
Deposition
30-10-2025
Deposition
18-02-2026
Deposition

Case Summary Case No: O.S. No. 132/2023 Order Date: 18-02-2026 Outcome: The case was heard with witness examination on oath. The court found that the defendants' claim to the disputed joint property is not supported by documentary evidence. The deed (NP-9) executed on 29.11.2012 did not mention a common road/right-of-way on the eastern side, and necessary parties were not made co-parties in the suit. The court concluded that the joint property belongs to the defendants' mother's house, not as a common asset, based on oral agreement between the parties. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case No: O.S. No. 132/2023 Order Date: 18-02-2026 Outcome: The case was heard with witness examination on oath. The court found that the defendants' claim to the disputed joint property is not supported by documentary evidence. The deed (NP-9) executed on 29.11.2012 did not mention a common road/right-of-way on the eastern side, and necessary parties were not made co-parties in the suit. The court concluded that the joint property belongs to the defendants' mother's house, not as a common asset, based on oral agreement between the parties. Case adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case