Shivanagouda S/o Naganagouda Patil vs Basavaraj S/o Halappa Ballary Advocate - K.N.D. — 60/2023

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV520001342023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

60/2023

Filing Date

03-03-2023

Registration No

60/2023

Registration Date

03-03-2023

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR

Judge

359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Shivanagouda S/o Naganagouda Patil

Adv. Umesh.M.Hittalamani

Respondent(s)

Basavaraj S/o Halappa Ballary Advocate - K.N.D.

D.2. Smt. Papavva W/o Basvarajappa Ballari

D.3. Smt. Ashwani Basavarajappa Ballari

D.4. Smt. Nayana W/o Malesh K

D.5. Smt. Shruthi W/o Nagesh M

D.6. Veeresh S/o Basavaraj Ballari

D.7. Saiyad Thahiruddin S/o Jahiruddin

Adv. RAK

Hearing History

Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

12-02-2026

EVIDENCE

09-01-2026

EVIDENCE

25-11-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

22-11-2025

APPEARANCE OF PARTY

Interim Orders

03-03-2023
Orders

Summary: The interim application (IA No.1) filed by the plaintiff for auxiliary relief under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC has been allowed. An ex-parte temporary injunction has been granted restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property until the next hearing. The plaintiff is directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3 of CPC, and the court office is directed to issue notice and the injunction order after compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The interim application (IA No.1) filed by the plaintiff for auxiliary relief under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC has been allowed. An ex-parte temporary injunction has been granted restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property until the next hearing. The plaintiff is directed to comply with Order 39 Rule 3 of CPC, and the court office is directed to issue notice and the injunction order after compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case