Sri. Chandrappa S/o Giddappa Lamani vs Sri. Budeppa S/o Giddappa Lamani Advocate - Exparte — 66/2021

Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV520001242021

Written Statement

Next Hearing

09th April 2026

Filing Number

66/2021

Filing Date

10-03-2021

Registration No

66/2021

Registration Date

10-03-2021

Court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR

Judge

359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

Acts & Sections

Order 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Chandrappa S/o Giddappa Lamani

Adv. K.N.DESHPANDE

Smt.Paravva W/o Somaleppa Lamani

Respondent(s)

Sri. Budeppa S/o Giddappa Lamani Advocate - Exparte

SriSuryappa S/o Giddappa Lamani

Adv. Exparte

Smt.Lalitavva W/o Bhimappa Lamani

Adv. Exparte

Smt.Shantavva W/o Chandrappa Lamani

Adv. J.I.K.

Smt.Sundaravva W/o Somaleppa Lamani

Adv. J.I.K.

Hearing History

Judge: 359-PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT RANEBENNUR

13-03-2026

Written Statement

09-03-2026

Amendment

06-03-2026

Amendment

26-02-2026

Amendment

16-02-2026

ORDERS

Interim Orders

15-02-2024
Deposition
18-06-2025
Deposition
26-02-2026
Orders

Summary: IA No. 3 filed by proposed defendants No. 6-10 seeking impleadment as parties to Original Suit No. 66/2021 (a partition and separate possession case) was allowed. The court held the applicants are necessary and proper parties whose rights would be affected by the suit outcome, and consequently impleaded them as defendants No. 6-10. The plaintiff was directed to file an amended plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: IA No. 3 filed by proposed defendants No. 6-10 seeking impleadment as parties to Original Suit No. 66/2021 (a partition and separate possession case) was allowed. The court held the applicants are necessary and proper parties whose rights would be affected by the suit outcome, and consequently impleaded them as defendants No. 6-10. The plaintiff was directed to file an amended plaint accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL CIVIL JUDGE AND I ADDL. JMFC, RANEBENNUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case