Mahaboob Jan W/o Shafiulla vs Makandar S/o Budansaha Bashirhamed — 2274/2024
Case under Section 166 Mv Act Section 166. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAHV510092372024
Filing Number
2274/2024
Filing Date
19-Dec-2024
Registration No
2274/2024
Registration Date
19-Dec-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
1246-III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahaboob Jan W/o Shafiulla
Adv. T M Kalkani
-
2.Muskaan Khanum D/o Shafilla,
-
3.Farhan Khan S/o Shafiuulla
-
4.Sima Khanam D/o Shafiulla
-
5.Ubedulla S/o Ayatu Khan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Makandar S/o Budansaha Bashirhamed
-
2.The Legal Claims Manager, Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co Ltd.,
Case History
-
16-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
-
13-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
In case MVC No. 2274/2024, on 13-02-2026, witnesses were examined and various documentary evidence including FIR report, complaint, site plan, vehicle registration, IME report, autopsy report, and final report were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned to the next main hearing after granting time to the petitioner's counsel, as scheduling constraints required postponement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
-
26-Sep-2025
Objections
III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
-
30-May-2025
Objections
III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
Written Statement
III Addl Senior Civil Judge and JMFC
-
30-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 2274/2024
In case MVC No. 2274/2024, on 13-02-2026, witnesses were examined and various documentary evidence including FIR report, complaint, site plan, vehicle registration, IME report, autopsy report, and final report were marked as exhibits. The case was adjourned to the next main hearing after granting time to the petitioner's counsel, as scheduling constraints required postponement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts