Kiran Naik S/o Bhadya Naik vs Anand S/o Haladappa B S — 1916/2024
Case under Section 166 Mv Act Section 166. Status: Judgments. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAHV510078562024
Filing Number
1916/2024
Filing Date
03-Oct-2024
Registration No
1916/2024
Registration Date
03-Dec-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
358-Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kiran Naik S/o Bhadya Naik
Adv. C.B.KANNAL.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anand S/o Haladappa B S
-
2.The Divisonal Manager National Insurance Co Ltd
Case History
-
25-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgments
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jan-2026
Report
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Nov-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2025
DepositionView PDF
The petition (MVC No. 1916/2024) was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claims regarding injuries and disability were not substantiated by credible evidence, and that falsified documents were submitted along with unreliable witness testimony. The court rejected the petitioner's application for compensation due to lack of proper documentation and medical evidence to support the claimed injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Aug-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Feb-2025
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2025
Objections
Prl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1916/2024
The petition (MVC No. 1916/2024) was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner's claims regarding injuries and disability were not substantiated by credible evidence, and that falsified documents were submitted along with unreliable witness testimony. The court rejected the petitioner's application for compensation due to lack of proper documentation and medical evidence to support the claimed injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts