Veena W/o Prakash H M vs The Managing Director, NWKRTC Haveri Division Haveri Depot Manager, NWKRTC Ranebennur Depot,. — 1872/2024
Case under Section 166 Mv Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAHV510075592024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
1872/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
1872/2024
Registration Date
26-11-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
654-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RANEBENNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Veena W/o Prakash H M
Adv. M M Lamani
Respondent(s)
The Managing Director, NWKRTC Haveri Division Haveri Depot Manager, NWKRTC Ranebennur Depot,.
Hearing History
Judge: 654-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RANEBENNUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: M.V.C. No. 1872/2024 | Date: 20-02-2026 The court rejected the witness's testimony regarding disability claims in this motor vehicle compensation case. The judge found that the witness gave false evidence about the petitioner's injuries, treatment details, and degree of disability, noting inconsistencies between the disability certificate and medical examination findings. The court determined the petitioner sustained a fractured patella (kneecap) with no permanent disability, rejecting claims of 30% disability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: M.V.C. No. 1872/2024 | Date: 20-02-2026 The court rejected the witness's testimony regarding disability claims in this motor vehicle compensation case. The judge found that the witness gave false evidence about the petitioner's injuries, treatment details, and degree of disability, noting inconsistencies between the disability certificate and medical examination findings. The court determined the petitioner sustained a fractured patella (kneecap) with no permanent disability, rejecting claims of 30% disability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts