Shamanth S K S/o Kumaraswamy M.K. Rby MG Natural Mother Rajiini S W/o Kumaraswamy M K vs The Managing Director, NWKRTC haveri Division HaveriDepot Manager, NWKRTC Ranebennur Depot. — 1870/2024
Case under Section 166 Mv Act Section 166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAHV510075552024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
1870/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
1870/2024
Registration Date
26-11-2024
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RANEBENNUR
Judge
654-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RANEBENNUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shamanth S K S/o Kumaraswamy M.K. Rby MG Natural Mother Rajiini S W/o Kumaraswamy M K
Adv. M M Lamani
Respondent(s)
The Managing Director, NWKRTC haveri Division HaveriDepot Manager, NWKRTC Ranebennur Depot.
Hearing History
Judge: 654-I ADDL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC RANEBENNUR
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No. M.V.C. No. 1870/2024 In this Motor Vehicles Act claim heard on 20-02-2026, the court examined witness testimony (P.W-2) regarding injury compensation. The court found the witness's testimony regarding disability assessment to be unreliable and contradictory, noting inconsistencies in claims about treatment, injury severity, and permanent disability percentage. The court rejected the witness's assertion of 45% disability without proper medical substantiation and examination, ultimately dismissing key claims in the disability assessment petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No. M.V.C. No. 1870/2024 In this Motor Vehicles Act claim heard on 20-02-2026, the court examined witness testimony (P.W-2) regarding injury compensation. The court found the witness's testimony regarding disability assessment to be unreliable and contradictory, noting inconsistencies in claims about treatment, injury severity, and permanent disability percentage. The court rejected the witness's assertion of 45% disability without proper medical substantiation and examination, ultimately dismissing key claims in the disability assessment petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts