The State of Karnataka vs A-1. Shabbir S/o Maqbulsab Shidenur — 1014/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323, 354(B), 504 R/w 34. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 17th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHV410015112022

JUDGEMENT

Next Hearing

17th March 2026

Filing Number

1014/2022

Filing Date

21-11-2022

Registration No

1014/2022

Registration Date

21-11-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR

Judge

357-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC COURT HIREKERUR

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323, 354(B), 504 R/w 34

Petitioner(s)

The State of Karnataka

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

A-1. Shabbir S/o Maqbulsab Shidenur

A-2. Jafarsadiq S/o Maqbulsab Shidenur

Hearing History

Judge: 357-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC COURT HIREKERUR

12-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

03-03-2026

EVIDENCE

15-12-2025

EVIDENCE

11-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

The document is in Kannada and contains witness examination records from Civil Judge and JMFC Court case C.C. No. 1014/2022. The court examined multiple witnesses on 06.03.2026, recording their statements regarding an alleged incident from 23-02-2022 involving abusive language and assault claims. In each witness examination section, the witnesses testified under oath, and the defense (represented by advocate SNM) indicated no cross-examination. The case continues with witness depositions recorded as exhibits (NIP-1, NIP-2, NIP-3, NIP-4, etc.). No final judgment or specific court order granting/denying relief is evident in these excerpts—these are intermediate witness examination proceedings in an ongoing civil case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The document is in Kannada and contains witness examination records from Civil Judge and JMFC Court case C.C. No. 1014/2022. The court examined multiple witnesses on 06.03.2026, recording their statements regarding an alleged incident from 23-02-2022 involving abusive language and assault claims. In each witness examination section, the witnesses testified under oath, and the defense (represented by advocate SNM) indicated no cross-examination. The case continues with witness depositions recorded as exhibits (NIP-1, NIP-2, NIP-3, NIP-4, etc.). No final judgment or specific court order granting/denying relief is evident in these excerpts—these are intermediate witness examination proceedings in an ongoing civil case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case