Hurambi W/o Modinasaba Bavannanavara vs Bebijan W/o Hajarathalisaba Attikatti — 102/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 7. Status: Objection. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV410011622021
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
102/2021
Filing Date
07-04-2021
Registration No
102/2021
Registration Date
07-04-2021
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
357-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC COURT HIREKERUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hurambi W/o Modinasaba Bavannanavara
Adv. VVM
Mariyanabi w/o Jalilsab deli @Benkipuri
Respondent(s)
Bebijan W/o Hajarathalisaba Attikatti
Hashina w/o Goususab Setsanadi
Jareena w/o Mohammed Rafik Mattur.
Raziyabegam w/o Mohammed Husen Attikatti.
Inthiyaz s/o Mohammed Husen Attikatti.
Nashingulab w/o Barakath ulla Pyati.
Shaminabanu w/o Sadikali Hamsabhavi.
Sattarsab s/o nannesab attikatti.
Hearing History
Judge: 357-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC COURT HIREKERUR
Objection
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ADDL W S
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Objection |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-09-2025 | ADDL W S |
Interim Orders
Case Summary O.S No. 102/2021 - Order dated 29.05.2024 The court ordered the admission of two documentary exhibits (Annexures 12 and 13) into evidence in this civil suit. The case involves property/succession matters regarding the distribution of ancestral property, with disputes over ownership rights spanning 30-year and 20-year periods, and a subsequent 5-year possession claim. The court proceeded to hear arguments on the merits and admitted the evidence for consideration in rendering judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary O.S No. 102/2021 - Order dated 29.05.2024 The court ordered the admission of two documentary exhibits (Annexures 12 and 13) into evidence in this civil suit. The case involves property/succession matters regarding the distribution of ancestral property, with disputes over ownership rights spanning 30-year and 20-year periods, and a subsequent 5-year possession claim. The court proceeded to hear arguments on the merits and admitted the evidence for consideration in rendering judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts