Gapharasab S/o Dulesab Byali, R/o Bhandivad Base Hubballi vs Sikandarakhan S/o Aadamkhan Jamakhandi, R/o Hubballi — 363/2019
Case under 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section Rule7. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV410010772019
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
364/2019
Filing Date
19-12-2019
Registration No
363/2019
Registration Date
19-12-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
1043-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT HIREKERUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gapharasab S/o Dulesab Byali, R/o Bhandivad Base Hubballi
Adv. PVK
Respondent(s)
Sikandarakhan S/o Aadamkhan Jamakhandi, R/o Hubballi
Hearing History
Judge: 1043-I ADDL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT HIREKERUR
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Steps |
| 24-01-2026 | Steps |
| 06-11-2025 | Steps |
| 18-09-2025 | Steps |
| 31-07-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: In O.S. No. 363/2019, the court order dated 13.12.2024 addresses a property dispute concerning inheritance rights and property ownership. The court held that the petitioner has rights to the joint family property and that the property should be registered in the petitioner's mother's name in the village revenue records as per the court's directions based on evidence of rights dating back to 05.12.1987 and 10.02.1989. The court dismissed arguments that the joint family property cannot be partitioned and ruled that the property shall remain under joint family management while protecting the petitioner's established rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In O.S. No. 363/2019, the court order dated 13.12.2024 addresses a property dispute concerning inheritance rights and property ownership. The court held that the petitioner has rights to the joint family property and that the property should be registered in the petitioner's mother's name in the village revenue records as per the court's directions based on evidence of rights dating back to 05.12.1987 and 10.02.1989. The court dismissed arguments that the joint family property cannot be partitioned and ruled that the property shall remain under joint family management while protecting the petitioner's established rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts