Shivakumar S/o Lingaraj Chindi vs Chandrakala W/o Rakesh Chinchali — 180/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1and3. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV410007182025

Filing Number

180/2025

Filing Date

04-Jun-2025

Registration No

180/2025

Registration Date

04-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR

Judge

357-Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1and3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shivakumar S/o Lingaraj Chindi

    Adv. G.S.Mattur

  2. 2.Pushpa D/o Lingaraj Chindi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakala W/o Rakesh Chinchali

  2. 2.Rakesh S/o Nagappa Chinchali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court dismissed the case of petitioners Shivakumar and Pushpa against respondents Chandrakala and Rakesh for default. Despite being granted sufficient time to present arguments, the plaintiff's counsel failed to proceed, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing On I A

    Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Hearing On I A

    Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

  7. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing On I A

    Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

  8. 16-Aug-2025

    Hearing On I A

    Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

  9. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing On I A

    Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur

  10. 12-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 04-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 180/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case of petitioners Shivakumar and Pushpa against respondents Chandrakala and Rakesh for default. Despite being granted sufficient time to present arguments, the plaintiff's counsel failed to proceed, demonstrating lack of interest in pursuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case