Manjula W/o Narayanarao vs D1.Jeejamma@ Jeejabai W/o Shivamurteppa Marata — 200/2023
Case under 7 Rule 1 and 3 Cpc Section 7. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV410004412023
Filing Number
200/2023
Filing Date
24-Jun-2023
Registration No
200/2023
Registration Date
24-Jun-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
357-Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
Last updated 13-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Manjula W/o Narayanarao
Adv. KBB
-
2.P2. Sudha w/o Prakash
-
3.P3. Hemavathi @ Kaveri W/o Lokesha
-
4.P4. Deepa W/o Ananda P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.D1.Jeejamma@ Jeejabai W/o Shivamurteppa Marata
-
2.D2. Rekha w/o Bhagavan Arera
-
3.D3. Basavaraja S/o Shivamurteppa Marata
-
4.D4. Pralada S/o Narasappa Marata @ Arera
Case History
-
06-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
29-Nov-2025
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
18-Oct-2025
List Of Witness And Documents
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
30-Aug-2025
List Of Witness And Documents
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
05-Jul-2025
List Of Witness And Documents
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
30-Jun-2025
Settlement
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
27-Jun-2025
Settlement
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
10-Jun-2025
Sec 89 CPC
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
09-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
06-Jun-2025
Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
02-May-2025
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
20-Mar-2025
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
22-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary: In O.S. No. 200/2023, the court recorded the testimony of PW-1 (Plaintiff's Witness 1) on 22.02.2025 after the witness submitted their examination-in-chief affidavit. The witness affirmed that all statements in the affidavit are true and the signatures are authentic. Nine documents were admitted as evidence (Exh. 1-9), and the defendant's counsel requested time to file a cross-examination response, which was granted with adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
10-Feb-2025
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
12-Dec-2024
Objection to I A
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
06-Dec-2024
Settlement
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
03-Dec-2024
Objection to I A
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
12-Nov-2024
Settlement
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
27-Aug-2024
Objection to I A
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
01-Jul-2024
Objection to I A
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
13-Jun-2024
Objection to I A
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
03-Apr-2024
Objection to I A
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
16-Jan-2024
Evidence
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
15-Jan-2024
Appearance Of Party
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
10-Oct-2023
Appearance Of Party
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
05-Sep-2023
Appearance Of Party
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
03-Aug-2023
Written Stetement
Principal CIVIL Judge and JMFC Court Hirekerur
-
24-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 200/2023
Summary: In O.S. No. 200/2023, the court recorded the testimony of PW-1 (Plaintiff's Witness 1) on 22.02.2025 after the witness submitted their examination-in-chief affidavit. The witness affirmed that all statements in the affidavit are true and the signatures are authentic. Nine documents were admitted as evidence (Exh. 1-9), and the defendant's counsel requested time to file a cross-examination response, which was granted with adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts