Krishananaik S/o Venkannanaik Mallenahalli vs Basavaraj S/o Ishwarappa Lekkappalavar — 20/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1and2. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV410000702025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

19th June 2026

Filing Number

20/2025

Filing Date

20-01-2025

Registration No

20/2025

Registration Date

20-01-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR

Judge

357-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC COURT HIREKERUR

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Krishananaik S/o Venkannanaik Mallenahalli

Adv. GVK

Respondent(s)

Basavaraj S/o Ishwarappa Lekkappalavar

D2. Anilkumar S/o Mukappa Lekkappalavar

D3. Arunakumar S/o Mukhappa Lekkappalavar

D4. Venkappa S/o Ishwarappa Lekkappalavar

D5. Nasarusab S/o Mahammadsab Ghasi

D6. Yashmin S/o Mahammad Husen Ghasi

D7. Nasirahmad S/o Makabulsab Ghasi

Hearing History

Judge: 357-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC COURT HIREKERUR

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE

06-11-2025

EVIDENCE

12-09-2025

LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS

04-08-2025

LIST OF WITNESS AND DOCUMENTS

Interim Orders

03-06-2025
Orders

Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (petition) filed under CPC Section 39(1-2) seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for relief and that granting the injunction would cause greater harm to the defendants than to the plaintiff. The case involves a property dispute regarding right of way and agricultural land access in Karnataka. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed the plaintiff's interim application (petition) filed under CPC Section 39(1-2) seeking a temporary injunction against the defendants. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for relief and that granting the injunction would cause greater harm to the defendants than to the plaintiff. The case involves a property dispute regarding right of way and agricultural land access in Karnataka. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case