Ganganagouda S/o Veerahanumantagouda Lakkanagoudar, Age-64 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli vs Sushilamma W/o Siddappa Lakkanagoudar, Age-77 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Hirekerur — 35/2020
Case under Under Order 41 Rule 1 R/2 Sec.96 of Cpc Section U/O41RuleR/w,sec.96,ofCPC. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
R.A. - Regular Appeals
CNR: KAHV400009202020
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
35/2020
Filing Date
02-12-2020
Registration No
35/2020
Registration Date
02-12-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ganganagouda S/o Veerahanumantagouda Lakkanagoudar, Age-64 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Adv. H M Soratur
Respondent(s)
Sushilamma W/o Siddappa Lakkanagoudar, Age-77 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Hirekerur
Anasuya W/o Honnappa Karur, Age-54 Yrs, R/o Harihar Town, Tq-Hirekerur
Shivanandappagouda S/o Veerahanumantagouda Lakkanagoudar, Age-68 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Adiveppagouda S/o Veerahanumantagouda Lakkanagoudar, Age-62 Yrs, R/o Hosabeereshwara Nagar, 1st cros
Chandrashekhargouda A/F Siddanagouda Lakkanagoudar, Age-66 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli(Legal Heir)
Susheelamma W/o Siddalingappa Shiragambi, Age-72 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Ningamma W/o Gurushantappa Aanur, Age-70 Yrs, R/o Joyisaraharalalalli Tq-Ranebennur
Shantamma W/o Basavaraj Bannihatti, Age-55 Yrs, R/o Kunchur Tq-Rattihalli
Shivanagouda S/o Basappa Lakkanagoudar, Age- 68 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Hemanagouda S/o Basappa Lakkanagoudar, Age-66 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Mahaeshgouda S/o Basappa Lakkanagoudar, Age-64 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Karegouda S/o Basappa Lakkanagoudar, Age-60 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Shekharagouda S/o Basappa Lakkanagoudar, Age-48 Yrs, R/o Kadur Tq-Rattihalli
Hearing History
Judge: 969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 29-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 08-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
| 09-10-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In case R.A. No. 35/2020, the court order dated 20-02-2023 addresses a revision petition regarding a matter involving custody/guardianship issues under Section 100/2016. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked merit and rejected the petition on grounds that the case had already been decided in 2014 and 2016, and no fresh grounds warranted reconsideration. The petition is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case R.A. No. 35/2020, the court order dated 20-02-2023 addresses a revision petition regarding a matter involving custody/guardianship issues under Section 100/2016. The court found that the petitioner's claims lacked merit and rejected the petition on grounds that the case had already been decided in 2014 and 2016, and no fresh grounds warranted reconsideration. The petition is dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts