Canara Bank of having its Head Office at Bangalore, Br. Office at Chikkerur vs Shivakumar S/o Mahalingappa Jadar — 61/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R1and2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV400006472024
Filing Number
61/2024
Filing Date
10-06-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
10-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank of having its Head Office at Bangalore, Br. Office at Chikkerur
Adv. U B JOGIHALLI
Respondent(s)
Shivakumar S/o Mahalingappa Jadar
Hanumantappa S/o Mahalingappa Jadar
Hearing History
Judge: 969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Senior Civil Court at Hirekéruru partially granted Canara Bank's money recovery suit against two agricultural borrowers. The court decreed that the defendants must repay Rs. 7,73,033/- at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date, failing which the bank is authorized to proceed with recovery through legal process against the mortgaged property. The defendants had obtained an agricultural crop loan of Rs. 3,50,000/- in 2016 but failed to repay it as agreed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Senior Civil Court at Hirekéruru partially granted Canara Bank's money recovery suit against two agricultural borrowers. The court decreed that the defendants must repay Rs. 7,73,033/- at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date, failing which the bank is authorized to proceed with recovery through legal process against the mortgaged property. The defendants had obtained an agricultural crop loan of Rs. 3,50,000/- in 2016 but failed to repay it as agreed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts