Canara Bank of having its Head office at Bangalore, Br. at Chikkerur vs Basanagouda S/o Shadiyappa Gurambalavar — 56/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R1and2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV400006402024
Filing Number
56/2024
Filing Date
10-06-2024
Registration No
56/2024
Registration Date
10-06-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank of having its Head office at Bangalore, Br. at Chikkerur
Adv. U B JOGIHALLI
Respondent(s)
Basanagouda S/o Shadiyappa Gurambalavar
Hearing History
Judge: 969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Hirekere ruled on March 6, 2026, that Canara Bank is partially entitled to recover Rs. 8,40,421/- from the defendant (Basnagoud) at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date. The defendant had borrowed Rs. 4,00,000/- under the Kisan Credit Card scheme on September 27, 2017, at 10.85% interest for agricultural purposes but failed to repay, and the bank established its claim through documentary evidence and testimony. If the defendant fails to repay, the court authorized the bank to proceed with legal foreclosure of mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Hirekere ruled on March 6, 2026, that Canara Bank is partially entitled to recover Rs. 8,40,421/- from the defendant (Basnagoud) at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date. The defendant had borrowed Rs. 4,00,000/- under the Kisan Credit Card scheme on September 27, 2017, at 10.85% interest for agricultural purposes but failed to repay, and the bank established its claim through documentary evidence and testimony. If the defendant fails to repay, the court authorized the bank to proceed with legal foreclosure of mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts