Canara Bank of having its Head office at Bangalore, Br. at Chikkerur vs Basanagouda S/o Shadiyappa Gurambalavar — 56/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R1and2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV400006402024

Case disposed

Filing Number

56/2024

Filing Date

10-06-2024

Registration No

56/2024

Registration Date

10-06-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR

Judge

969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7R1and2

Petitioner(s)

Canara Bank of having its Head office at Bangalore, Br. at Chikkerur

Adv. U B JOGIHALLI

Respondent(s)

Basanagouda S/o Shadiyappa Gurambalavar

Hearing History

Judge: 969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

Disposed

29-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

12-11-2025

EVIDENCE

18-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Hirekere ruled on March 6, 2026, that Canara Bank is partially entitled to recover Rs. 8,40,421/- from the defendant (Basnagoud) at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date. The defendant had borrowed Rs. 4,00,000/- under the Kisan Credit Card scheme on September 27, 2017, at 10.85% interest for agricultural purposes but failed to repay, and the bank established its claim through documentary evidence and testimony. If the defendant fails to repay, the court authorized the bank to proceed with legal foreclosure of mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Senior Civil Judge of Hirekere ruled on March 6, 2026, that Canara Bank is partially entitled to recover Rs. 8,40,421/- from the defendant (Basnagoud) at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date. The defendant had borrowed Rs. 4,00,000/- under the Kisan Credit Card scheme on September 27, 2017, at 10.85% interest for agricultural purposes but failed to repay, and the bank established its claim through documentary evidence and testimony. If the defendant fails to repay, the court authorized the bank to proceed with legal foreclosure of mortgaged property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case