Canara Bank, Masur, Rept. By its Branch MG V.Rajashekhar Reddy S/o Madhusudhan vs Revaneppa S/o Sannachoudappa Nagannanavar — 59/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7Rule1&2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAHV400004272025
Filing Number
59/2025
Filing Date
03-05-2025
Registration No
59/2025
Registration Date
03-05-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR
Judge
969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Canara Bank, Masur, Rept. By its Branch MG V.Rajashekhar Reddy S/o Madhusudhan
Adv. U B JOGIHALLI
Respondent(s)
Revaneppa S/o Sannachoudappa Nagannanavar
Channabasamma W/o Sannachoudappa Nagannanavar
Devaraj S Nagannanavar
Hearing History
Judge: 969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 10-12-2025 | JUDGEMENT |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially decreed Canara Bank's money recovery suit against three agricultural loan defaulters. The court directed defendants to repay Rs. 7,48,854 at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date; failure to repay would permit the bank to proceed with legal recovery proceedings against the mortgaged property. The court rejected the bank's claim for 11.65% interest, holding that 6% simple interest was appropriate for agricultural loans under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially decreed Canara Bank's money recovery suit against three agricultural loan defaulters. The court directed defendants to repay Rs. 7,48,854 at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date; failure to repay would permit the bank to proceed with legal recovery proceedings against the mortgaged property. The court rejected the bank's claim for 11.65% interest, holding that 6% simple interest was appropriate for agricultural loans under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts