Canara Bank, Masur, Rept. By its Branch MG V.Rajashekhar Reddy S/o Madhusudhan vs Revaneppa S/o Sannachoudappa Nagannanavar — 59/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7Rule1&2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 06th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHV400004272025

Case disposed

Filing Number

59/2025

Filing Date

03-05-2025

Registration No

59/2025

Registration Date

03-05-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR

Judge

969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Decision Date

06th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o7Rule1&2

Petitioner(s)

Canara Bank, Masur, Rept. By its Branch MG V.Rajashekhar Reddy S/o Madhusudhan

Adv. U B JOGIHALLI

Respondent(s)

Revaneppa S/o Sannachoudappa Nagannanavar

Channabasamma W/o Sannachoudappa Nagannanavar

Devaraj S Nagannanavar

Hearing History

Judge: 969-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

Disposed

29-01-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-12-2025

JUDGEMENT

12-11-2025

EVIDENCE

18-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Final Orders / Judgements

06-03-2026
Judgment

Summary The court partially decreed Canara Bank's money recovery suit against three agricultural loan defaulters. The court directed defendants to repay Rs. 7,48,854 at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date; failure to repay would permit the bank to proceed with legal recovery proceedings against the mortgaged property. The court rejected the bank's claim for 11.65% interest, holding that 6% simple interest was appropriate for agricultural loans under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially decreed Canara Bank's money recovery suit against three agricultural loan defaulters. The court directed defendants to repay Rs. 7,48,854 at 6% annual interest within 6 months from the judgment date; failure to repay would permit the bank to proceed with legal recovery proceedings against the mortgaged property. The court rejected the bank's claim for 11.65% interest, holding that 6% simple interest was appropriate for agricultural loans under the circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HIREKERUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case